To clarify the process needed
Whether the process needed for both purchase and sales invoice or Purchase Invoice only?
Post Edited by vinothbabu at 11/11/2009 07:13
Openbravo Forum End of Life Notice
Dear Openbravo Forum User,
Because of continued very low usage we decided to stop the forums on 31st of August 2017
In case of questions: webmaster "at" openbravo.com
Whether the process needed for both purchase and sales invoice or Purchase Invoice only?
As you see in the example (=>reply of the last posting), we need this behaviour for both: sales and purchse invoice.
Agreed. The requirements describe the need for this funtionality both on the AR and AP sides.
If this process needed for sale invoice , we don't have Accounting Dimension tab at invoice's line level. What to do ?
Hello, I'm sorry, but there was a question to "Intra Org Booking of Internal Services" just before this. So let me correct my answer:
This functionality is needed only for purchase invoices.
So the process only needed for "Purchase Invoice" only for the project of "IntraOrg Booking across Accounting Areas" . Is it correct?
Full message from Michael:
Hi Richard,
I’m sorry, but I was confused by the question before about “Intra Org Booking of Internal Services”.
The correct answer for this question is: only needed for Purchase Invoice
I have a look on the document about the existing behaviour. The images look fine, but if you look in the database (table fact_acct) you can see, that the booking entries are not as expected. Both entries belong to the same organization “main”, which was choosen on the header and the lines tab, and not to the organization on the account combinations tab (A and B).
Beside of this, we need some specific booking entries (as described in the Functional Spec) to reflect the payables and receivables between the different accounting areas.
Regards
Michael
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest